I share your disdain for terms @KiTkAT( •̀ .̫ •́ )✧/jk but I can't remember my sources that spawned this line of thought and remembering them would help me find the article again lol
i was just looking if you were going to say that "just like masking at work makes you not be real you and you shouldn't mask, you should be open about being a tulpamancer" or something like that
yeah, that's what spawned the connection in my head--it seems like a good analogy
1:30 AM
the difference is that the masks are associated with the "you" in your head, and tulpamancy is all about separating out the identity into an entirely new object
very easily you could get a headmate by treating one of your social masks as a headmate and they would be immediatelly quite developed depending on how different that social mask is
but the more they dig into that, the more actually median they become
Leiko
very easily you could get a headmate by treating one of your social masks as a headmate and they would be immediatelly quite developed depending on how different that social mask is
goodnight! I'm gonna keep rambling for a bit but then I really do need to let blanka play with music
1:33 AM
this is, in my opinion, a social engineering problem, in the literal sense of engineering (not in the "hacking into systems by exploiting people being nice" sense)
I personally think that we could get a lot more benefit by treating society as an engineering problem, with constraints, atomic interactions, calculations to optimize for specific metrics, etc
optimizing to fix the fringe internet community thing would do a lot to benefit individuals, but it also very firmly entrenches the "present" social norms
1:35 AM
because every socially progressive movement started as a fringe internet subculture--or the analogous form for the time period
so finding out where the line of "harm" is is a very important and difficult problem. It is a fuzzy, moving target, and may be impossible to optimize for (at least, without a fundamental shift in our scientific understanding of human social dynamics)
There's a bit more in the "social engineering" thought bubble but I think infodumping it might be out of scope for tulpa discussion (even though this did naturally evolve from a very tulpa-focused discussion) so I think I'll stop there and let blanka have her music practice
i think it's just different for everyone which makes it more complicated and there won't really.. be an end-all solution
1:38 AM
or maybe there is, i dunno
1:38 AM
anyways good luck with the music
blanka
so finding out where the line of "harm" is is a very important and difficult problem. It is a fuzzy, moving target, and may be impossible to optimize for (at least, without a fundamental shift in our scientific understanding of human social dynamics)
Yeah, it's fascinating--while the experience of imagining is very vivid and detailed to me, actually digging into the details when I am imagining reveals that it is really a very impressionistic space
8:26 PM
I just have a very strong idea of someone hitting the ball off a table, but it takes dedicated effort to imagine the person, how they move, the ball, etc
this article made me realize how not alone i am in how kind of frustrating it is to try and visualize, im so used to the idea of what im seeing that it takes alot of effort to truly see things w my minds eye >_<(edited)
be and emily found out you can basically do old school magic shows
2:52 AM
by changing the way the interact with objects
2:52 AM
just as havime pass thru a box
2:53 AM
and for emily be solid(edited)
2:53 AM
i found out you can basically no clip
2:53 AM
or you can basically infinately contort yourelf into the box
2:54 AM
the trick ended up going as fallow
2:54 AM
1 open box
2:54 AM
2. step in box still obviously to large to fit in
2:55 AM
3. ask someone to close said box (remember this is old school) and crouch in it as much as you can when you are almost no longer visible contort in box(edited)